Divided opinions on AI in healthcare

Are you and your doctor ready for AI? While patients may be getting more comfortable with AI, how healthcare professionals embrace AI is critical to its evolution and eventual use.

Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School conducted a poll in May among 3,317 adults age 18 and over in the U.S. and included a sample of 357 healthcare workers who were asked about how AI is already affecting their jobs, and how it might continue to do so in the future.

So how comfortable are healthcare professionals with AI? According to the study, “Healthcare professionals are somewhat divided in their opinions of AI: 23% think the use of AI in healthcare will help more than it hurts, 33% think it will hurt more than it helps, and 42% think it will equally help and hurt.”

Another interesting but not surprising poll result is the age differentiation. According to the study, “Younger adults express more comfort with AI-led healthcare, with 40% of those 18-34 saying they would be comfortable with a primary care appointment led by AI, vs. just 24% among those 65 and older.”

A Becker’s story, published June 29 by Giles Bruce, “Where Americans want and don’t want AI in healthcare: 7 things to know”, provides the following highlights from the study:

    1. Two-thirds of Americans believe AI will play a bigger role in healthcare five years from now.
    2. 34 percent expect AI to be better than healthcare providers at treating patients without bias.
    3. 1 in 4 are comfortable with AI-led therapy.
    4. 22 percent expect AI to be better than medical professionals at diagnosing conditions.
    5. 12 percent said their healthcare providers currently use AI to augment treatment, diagnosis or communication.
    6. 83 percent of medical professionals don’t currently use AI.
    7. A third of healthcare providers say AI will do more harm than good.

AI is already being used in many ways in healthcare and will continue to evolve. IT leaders need to stay current as it evolves, leverage their existing vendor partners, carefully assess the new niche players and their claims, develop AI skills within their teams, partner with clinical and operational leaders to find ways to experiment that make the most sense for their organization, and learn from other organizations who are more advanced users of AI.

Bill Russell’s This Week Health podcasts often cover AI so it’s a great resource for keeping up and hearing what the issues are and how it is being used in different organizations. One of the newest episodes is TownHall: The Potential and Unknowns of AI and Emerging Tech in Healthcare, Part 1, a conversation between Dr. Brett Oliver, Family Physician and Chief Medical Information Officer at Baptist Health and John League, Managing Director, Digital Health Research at Advisory Board.

As my favorite television news anchor likes to say, “watch this space”.

Related Posts:

AI and AI – Use them Responsibly

AI in healthcare – is 2023 the breakout year?

Navigating the AI landscape in healthcare: HIMSS23 recaps and more

Navigating the AI landscape in healthcare: HIMSS23 recaps and more

Last week I jumped in on the hot topic of AI with my post, “AI in healthcare – is 2023 the breakout year?”. HIMSS23 was just wrapping up so I was waiting to hear overall recaps and especially updates on AI and ChatGPT.

Those recaps came as expected. Here’s a short compilation of several I found:

And finally, a resource to keep watching and listening to is Bill Russell’s This Week Health. His most recent Newsday show was “Today: Deploying Chat-GPT in your setting”. He references an article by Jonathan Balaban, a data scientist, and emphasizes the need for governance and security. Bill sees a lot of potential for ChatGPT but argues organizations need boundaries. As my favorite television news anchor likes to say, “watch this space”.

The use of AI in healthcare is evolving quickly. Every vendor seems to be an AI vendor in some form, or so they say. CIOs need to stay current, leverage their current vendor partners, carefully assess the new niche players and their claims, develop AI skills within their teams, and find ways to experiment that make the most sense for their organization.

If you have AI stories to share, please do. I may use them in future posts.

AI in healthcare – is 2023 the breakout year?

It has been a while since I wrote on a technology subject. I usually leave it to others who stay much more current and are doing the day-to-day IT work in healthcare organizations. But the rapid acceleration of generative AI with ChatGPT the past several months has caught my attention.

I put my toe in the water and asked it to draft some marketing messages for me several weeks ago. For first drafts, they weren’t too bad. Using ChatGPT in this way gets you past the blank sheet of paper (or screen) and writer’s block. Or as my minister husband would say at times when writing a sermon, you need to get past picking out the font.

My StarBridge Advisors colleague, David Muntz, recently used ChatGPT to do an internal presentation on AI for our advisor team and gave ChatGPT “co-author” credit to make a point.

Bill Russell has talked about it often on This Week Health podcasts. He and his team are exploring ways they can use it in their business. Here are just a few of the podcasts he’s done on ChatGPT:

Generative AI, the new Medical Generalist

GPT4 Use ideas and Use Cases

ChatGPT4 on ChatGPT4

Several health system digital leaders told Becker’s that AI can only do so much in this article dated March 16, 2023, “How far is too far for AI in healthcare?”, and how it needs to be thought as of “augmented intelligence”. Ashish Atreja, MD, CIO and chief digital health officer of UC Davis Health said it well, “Machines lack internal consciousness, and the ability to distinguish right from wrong. Roles that depend on human empathy and critical decision-making in ambiguous situations can be supported but should never be replaced by AI.”

David Muntz’s blog post from October, 2022, “AI and AI – Use Them Responsibly”, talks about artificial intelligence and augmented intelligence. His view is similar to the digital leaders quoted in the Becker’s article. David closes his post by saying, “AI and AI should not be seen as ways to replace humans but as technologies that allow us to instantiate learnings from the human experience.  AI applied responsibly and compassionately allows people to share evidence-based practices and focus on the more human-oriented tasks that cannot be automated.  Importantly, AI helps us recover time to spend on our community, our providers, our patients, their families, and ourselves.”

The potential for medical AI is so significant that there will be a new AI-themed journal from the New England Journal of Medicine called NEJM AI. The inaugural editor-in-chief is Isaac Kohane, founding chair of the Department of Biomedical Informatics at Harvard Medical School. Continue reading